ЕСПЧ обязал выплатить €2,9 млн по делу о теракте в Беслане

Ну по новости - не родственникам террористов, а родственникам пострадавших и погибших заложников, типа Россия знала что 1 сентября может быть терракт в школах, но ничего не делали и никого не предупредили о возможности теракта.

Разве пострадавшие не получили помощь от государства?

любопытно, а пострадавшим в Европе от атак террористов, тоже присудят компенсации за бездействие властей?

Unanimously, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the
European Convention on Human Rights, arising from a failure to take preventive measures. The
authorities had been in possession of sufficiently specific information of a planned terrorist attack in
the area, linked to an educational institution. Nevertheless, not enough had been done to disrupt
the terrorists meeting and preparing; insufficient steps had been taken to prevent them travelling on
the day of the attack; security at the school had not been increased; and neither the school nor the
public had been warned of the threat.
Unanimously, the Court found that there had been a violation of the procedural obligation under
Article 2, primarily because the investigation had not been capable of leading to a determination of
whether the force used by the State agents had or had not been justified in the circumstances.
By five votes to two, the Court held that there had been a further violation of Article 2, due to
serious shortcomings in the planning and control of the security operation. The command structure
of the operation had suffered from a lack of formal leadership, resulting in serious flaws in decisionmaking and coordination with other relevant agencies.
By five votes to two, the Court also found that there had been a violation of Article 2 arising from
the use of lethal force by security forces. In the absence of proper legal rules, powerful weapons
such as tank cannon, grenade launchers and flame-throwers had been used on the school. This had
contributed to the casualties among the hostages and had not been compatible with the
requirement under Article 2 that lethal force be used “no more than [is] absolutely necessary.”
Taking into account the compensation already afforded to the victims in Russia and various domestic
procedures that had been aimed at establishing the circumstances of the events, the Court held, by
six votes to one, that there had been no violation of Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).
Under Article 46 (binding force and implementation of judgments), the Court indicated the need
for a variety of measures aimed at drawing lessons from the past, raising awareness of applicable
legal and operational standards, and deterring similar violations in the future. It also held that the
future requirements of the pending investigation into the incident must be determined with regard
to the Court’s conclusions about investigation’s failures to date.

> Стыдоба что государство не помогло

Шта?
Можно пруф на то, что не помогло?

юрист правозащитного центра «Мемориал» Кирилл Коротеев, который представлял в Страсбурге интересы части заявителей

А достаточно ли поддержки оказывает государство этим мемориалам?

> А государство не помогло? И какое значение имеет решение европейского суда на нашей территории?

Ну вам до меня уже про помощь написали.

то что применение тяжелого оружия наших войск повлекло за собой причинение вреда заложникам как написано в англоязычной версии, чего нет в версии топика.