> "У меня нет ничего нового, чтобы независимо подтвердить от имени Соединенных Штатов", - сказала Псаки.
И ч0 над ней смеются?
Нормальня девчёнка.
Симпатичная. Даже.
Надо бы и РФ свою псакочку завести. Полезно. (Жириновский никак, извините,не проходит.)
[censored]
Уже щас слышу очередную порцию разорвавшихся пуканов свидомитов.
Если бы у них не было доказательств, но было бы выгодно, она бы сказала что-то вроде "есть, но посылку я вам не отдам", как это было со сбитым боингом. Что является хорошим знаком, так как США решило сбавить обороты насчёт Донецка/Луганска, и кинуть Куев. Все же потери от конфронтации с Россией и от взаимных санкций оценили больше, чем самостийность и свидомисть восточно-европейского Сомали. Впрочем, последнему не в первой.
ничего она там не отрицала, "напереводили" как всегда.
вот оригинал:[censored]
Она как всегда выкручивается, но линия такая же: Россия виновата
QUESTION: Do you have any reason to doubt any of the allegations being made by the Ukrainians that they’re actually now fighting? It’s not just – it’s not just pro – there’s a pro-Russian separatists they’re fighting, it is the Russian army itself. And do you have any comments – since you did have a comment on President Putin and his “two week” remark, do you have any comment on the Ukrainian defense minister talking about this conflict as a great patriotic war?
MS. PSAKI: Well, the first question, Matt – I think Russia has certainly continued to increase its intervention in eastern Ukraine and is responsible for the escalating violence. We know it’s encouraged by Russia. It’s funded by Russia. The separatists are trained by Russia. And obviously, we’ve seen over the course of the last several weeks an escalating level of aggression from the Russian-backed separatists, and obviously, Russia has been fully engaged in that effort.
In terms of the specific comments of the defense minister, I’m happy to take a look at them if you want to send them over.
QUESTION: Okay. Well, do you have any reason to believe that the Ukrainians are incorrect or are correct when they say that Russia has invaded their country?
MS. PSAKI: Well, I think we’ve seen – and I don’t want to make a sweeping term because there are reports we have that are unconfirmed, and we speak to the ones that we have that are more confirmed, but --
QUESTION: Okay – that are more confirmed? (Laughter.)
MS. PSAKI: That are confirmed.
QUESTION: So, okay, can you speak – so speaking to the confirmed reports, are there Russian troops in Ukraine right now fighting the Ukrainian army, as the Ukrainians claim?
MS. PSAKI: Well, I think, Matt, I don’t have anything new to confirm for you independently from the United States. Obviously, we’ve seen an increasing level of aggression from the Russians. That includes the movement of troops across the border, which NATO and others have certainly spoken to and confirmed over the course of the last week. That includes continued – the continued effort to provide military assistance and the financing.
QUESTION: That means movement of troops across the – movement of Russian troops across the Ukrainian border into Ukraine. Is that what you’re talking about?
MS. PSAKI: Well, that’s been confirmed – I mean, last week.
QUESTION: Okay. So why is that not an invasion? Why do you shy away from this? I mean, the NATO commander said last week that if this was happening in a NATO member, it would invoke – Article 5 would be invoked, because it would be something that – it requires a military response. If one member is attacked, they’re all attacked. So why not call it the way you see it?
MS. PSAKI: Well, I think in our view it doesn’t matter what we call it. We’re calling it an illegal incursion. We’re saying they’re violating the sovereignty of Ukraine. We’ve obviously increased not only the number of sanctions and the kind of sanctions we’re putting in place, but we continue to consider a range of requests that the Ukrainians have issued. So our actions, in our view, and what we’re going to do about it is more important than what we call it.
Сейчас, сейчас